I don't personally hate TNA at all, I think its interesting............but I still can't put TNA over the PG-rated WWE yet.
Fact of the matter is, that is all TNA has above the WWE right now is that TNA is still a TV 14-rated wrestling organization compared to the WWE that has to PG all of their ****. I swear if the WWE was back to its TV-14 days, some of their stale storylines that they currently have at the moment will be spiced up a bit more and we'll have a lot more realistic "feuds" going on......not this "Smelly Kelly" bullshit from the Divas.
Granted, I'm not saying the regular male WWE wrestlers have similar bullshit storylines as the WWE Divas.........I'm just saying, some of the feuds don't seem realistic right now, not even the "revived" Undertaker/Kane brother feud seems realistic.
The World Heavyweight Title is the Undertaker's holy grail? C'MON SON........back in the day, the Undertaker really did have a holy grail. It's nice that they brought back Paul Bearer and all to solidify this Undertaker/Kane fued........but it doesn't seem as realistic and legit as the original Kane/Taker feud from WWF's past.