Star Trek: Into Darkness - Pre-Discussion

I feel nothing from that trailer at all. I don't hate it -- it looks like a good sci-fi film I can enjoy, but not a Star Trek film. Guess it's another 2 years of gradual acceptance for me. :redface2:

I really hope Star Trek Into Darkness ends up being the 2nd installment in a TRILOGY of J.J. Abrams' Star Trek. Then we get a 3rd final one not too long after and then back to the REAL Star Trek universe established over all the years... and we get the real "Star Trek XI" with a new crew and ship.

Real trek universe... HAHAHAHAHAH i'm sorry but what are you talking about?
 
Benedict Cumberbatch apparently isn't playing either Mitchell or Khan or Trelane or Alternate Picard or Q or (enter speculated character here), but is supposedly a new character named John Harrison: http://www.eonline.com/news/370941/...quel-s-new-villain-plus-more-big-screen-scoop

Then again, I guess they could be pulling the same thing the makers of Skyfall did with Eve. (Denying until the film's release who that character really was, although her identity had been rightly assumed from the start.)
 
What if Benedict Cumberbatch's character is a decoy antagonist and the real antagonist is a recasted Khan that has yet to be revealed.
Too bad it's so hard to keep secrets like that as of late, so its merely wishful thinking on my part :disappoin
 
Yeah I can totally see them do the whole big reveal of his true name at the very end like what happened in Skyfall and Eve.
 
Or the name "John Harrison" could be an alias.
*5 minutes before the climactic 1-on-1 fight scene*

I FORSAKE THE FALSE NAME "JOHN HARRISON"! FROM THIS DAY FORTH, YOU SHALL ADDRESS ME BY THE ORIGINAL NAME GIVEN TO ME BY THE ONE WHO GAVE BIRTH TO ME!!!



[HIDE]
HARRY MUDD!

tazq.gif
[/HIDE]
 
^
Dammit, beat me to it. :laugh:

EDIT: Looks like it's back up and working. :thumbs:
 
Last edited:

Latest News & Videos

Latest News

Back
Top