JustAnotherBlueRanger
Member
I don't recall expressing a preference for either villain.
Well perhaps this is my mistake but the impression I get is that you prefer Gayja as a villian.
My point there was pretty clearly that at this point, he's done nothing that supports the view that he is a 'credible threat' imo. I understand and fully accept that he may be planning something semi-decent behind the scenes, but I'm not going to form my present opinion based on stuff which hasn't been shown. If Flurious' future actions justify a reinterpretation of this early stuff then I will look at him in a new light but as things stand, what can you actually point to as proof of him being a credible threat to the rangers?
His little team-up with Moltar and his first throw-down with the Rangers I felt established him as a credible threat.
But really, in terms of the whole 'maybe he's up to something they've not shown us yet' point, I'd actually be surprised if that turned out to be the case since Flurious' recent scenes certainly haven't hinted at anything like that. They've all come off more as "I'm waiting for you to do all the legwork and then I'm just going to attack you" than "Keep wasting your time, once my new creation is completing, the crown and all the jewels will be mine!"
With Boukenger, by not seeing anything of Gajya for like 6-7 episodes, it was a lot easier to believe that he was planning something decent.
Depends on your preference regarding the former. A major villian taking advantage of another villian's hardwork is a staple of many genres and franchises. I don't really view it as making him 'lesser' in any way or form.
As for the second, I never believed Gayja was planning anything decent because by that point, he had already been established as a punching bag type character.
Nope. Removing Moltar or even Miratrix would have a massive impact on the continuing story and the series would undoubtedly be quite different without their input since they've actually done stuff relevant to the season's plot.
Boukenger's a slightly different case since it was so episodic so as a whole, removing single characters likely wouldn't make much difference, but on an episode by episode basis, it would and even that's something I can't say for Flurious.
You could remove the individual characters from the story, substitute in similiar characters and the events would play almost identical. Moltar is the rash, more violent and phyiscal element that complements Flurious's more plotting nature. Miratrix is the token female who's nature is somewhat unclear as we don't know exactly what she's up to.
Their roles dictate the conflicts and impact they each have on the overall story more so then their actual characters do.
Even assuming that that was the only memorable thing Gajya did outside of his debut (which it wasn't, he also had Task 6 and had a massive contribution to the events of 9-11), it's still one more thing than what we've actually seen from Flurious. And as I said, Gajya's behaviour in the first few eps and throughout the whole series was in line with his character concept.
Okay Task 6, NOT a MEMORABLE episode or task IMO. The only memorable thing about that task was it's the first time we see a Boukenger villian seek revenge on the ranger. And even then, You could put the other two villians in that episode, with that motivation and it would make sense. It was rather jarring to me to see that the only villian without a main rival was the first one to seek revenge on them.
I know OO's not up to that part yet. That's why I specifically referenced Boukenger's first 11 episodes.
Which brings up another point, I'll talk about below.
Well if your point is that Gordom Civilisation wasn't a big deal in the show, I'd agree with you. I never said it was, but it does serve to explain Gajya's motivations.
However vaguely.
So what? And I don't see who Flurious' ranger rival is meant to be at the moment either. Hell, I'd be surprised if the rangers, excluding Mack, can even remember what he looks like.
My guess on Flurious's rival will turn out be the Templar knight going by their setups.
That was more probably a copout on the part of the writers to make him easier to bring back for the team-up than any kind of proof that he was just a punching bag.
Sure it is. When have sentai writers EVER cared about a villians fate as far as it relates to a team-up? I mean, they've blatantly ressurrected the likes of AbareKiller and Shurikenger for team-ups and those two characters DIED onscreen in memorable fashion.
He's not even important enough to kill by the writers.
No, what is absurd is you making a statement such as:
"Flurious has been more involved with the series then Gayja was, so that's an improvement."
and continually failing to actually defend your point of view when challenged. Pretty much all you've done here and in previous posts is complain about Gajya and when you actually defend Flurious' role, you say stuff like:
"By hanging back and letting Ryu (and to a lesser extend the DS) play the role of the punching bag for these episodes, Flurious's character can be proteced and not suffer the same fate as Gayja did."
which really doesn't even close to addressing the actual point of contention. How does hanging back and letting the other villains do all the work while chilling (haha) in his ice palace with a stupid yeti equate to 'being more involved with the series' than Gajya? That's the issue at hand. I actually didn't think Gajya was a particularly good villain but he had his concept, he had his method of 'involvement' and he had an effect within the first 11 episodes. Flurious has not.
Oh Bullhockey.
I have defended my point about Flurious being more involved at this point then Gayja was. Right from the start, Flurious has been presented as not only the major villian but the dominant brother over Moltar. He has not been smacked around like Gayja was Ryu, nor was he embarassed by Miratrix the way Gayja was by the Dark Shadow when he offered them the use of the Karths.
On the other hand, I remember people openly complaining about a main villian not getting involved early and those same people complaining when a villian did get involve because he wasn't handled right in their view.
At the most basic level, PR writers are thoroughly handicapped by the fact they don't know Boukenger's storyline goes. So they have to make some very difficult choices regarding the characters and how they are handled. They can't do things as flippantly as Boukengers writers did with a character like Gayja. They could rush Flurious out there and have him get beaten around like Gayja was or present him as they have done so, a character who is clearly intended to be the dominant villian of the series but have him lurk behind the scenes in the first half of the series.
I would imagine as they figured out and caught up to Boukenger's storyline, they will start using Flurious like they would a main villian.
All we can do now is wait.