lazycoconut
I liked him when he wasn't a god
Yep, it shows well you lack of knowledge about comics. Under that niceness Peter Parker is a deeply faulty and complicated person, don't forget he was responsible for his uncle's death.
Batman in the 60's was a joke like all the other DC heroes. It wasn't until Marvel started to sell loads that DC got serious and redefined Batman into the dark, brooding hero he is as of today.
Faulty and flawed, but nice. A character can be faulty and/or flawed without being a dick about it.
That's truly narrow minded. That people behave in not a nice manner doesn't automatically make them evil and the opposite works too. You adore Enter, who almost always behaves in a sort of comedic way but he's still a villain with genocidal plans for the human race.
A character not being nice does not make them evil. It does demonstrate arrogance and moral apathy - thinking they're somehow above basic respect for others. That's not heroic at all.
I enjoy Enter, and Escape, because they're villains that enjoy evil. You can't write a morally good character that's genocidal. I expect heroes to be nice and villains to be evil. It's kind of in the job description.
Agreed in that Shotaro, Eiji and Gentaro have different personalities, but I would like you elaborated why Haruto is a bad example for kids. I've watched the episode twice and hasn't seen anything censurable about him.
Arrogance is a very poor trait in a hero. Everything about his voice, posture, etc. shows how cool he thinks he is. I don't like the way he patronized Rinko: all the "Rinko-chan" and trying to get out of jail by hitting on her, especially in Japan where deference to authority is expected. Or the way he tried to give Koyomi the brush-off when he knew she needed more of the ... bots?
On another note, what's that thing in the wallpaper manip?