[hide]It does appear that way, doesn't it?
And the original question was answered before you brought up your technicality. It's been a while since I've seen Hibiki, but from what I recall there wasn't really any evidence that she only began the henshin. I just remember seeing the feet of a transformed oni and a body that looked reminiscent of Ibuki. I know she collapsed, but then again the question wasn't asking if Akira was able to maintain a transformation in the show.
And my point was that someone asked whether Akira transformed. And correct me if I'm wrong, there was a definite shift from human form to oni form. Thus, since the question was answered and the member pointed in the right direction, I really didn't feel that technicality (if there really is one) needed to be brought up.[/hide]
Okay, NOW we're gettin' somewhere. :thumbs:
[hide]You said it yourself, the question was whether or not she
transformed. Even though I'm an English teacher, I don't need to tell you that the
-ed suffix at the end of "transformed" indicates an action that happened in the
past tense. The fact that "transformed" was written in the
past tense implies that the transformation was completed. Now, after going through my burned DVD collection, I found said episode and watched said scene, and like I've said before,
she didn't quite complete it. She was on the verge of completing the henshin (as was indicated by her beginning to take on her Oni form), but she WAS still in the "henshin process" when she collapsed unconscious. It would be more grammatically correct to say that she was in the midst of transform
ing in this ep. She did not, regrettably (personally I really wanted to see her kick some major tail as an Oni) complete the henshin, which means that grammatically, saying she transform
ed is not quite correct.
Did she attempt the henshin? Yes.
Did she fully complete it? After re-watching the scene, I have to say no, she didn't.[/hide]