Is marriage ruining Comic Characters...?

Only in the eyes of comic fans. The FF have always been a mixed success outside of comics. Spidey is the flagship franchise, that makes him and MJ the flagship couple no matter what others claim.

The argument there is weak at best. For instance, Batman is the flagship DC character, but that doesn't mean other things related to him become flagship as well.

If you intend to move Spider-man back to the flagship idea, to the mainstream, there is no marriage. Spider-Man 3 and the Sensational cartoon all feature an unmarried Spider-man. If anything, your argument was agreeing with Joe Quesada's insane idea.

Those people can't seem to get it through their skulls Gwen was an emotional basket-case who self-destructed around everyone at the drop of a pin, had a thing for older men because of being too attached to her father, Peter didnt know what "love" was at the time, and MJ was always trying to date him before he even met Gwen, had loved him from afar, and had always been the fun-loving pillar of support for everyone, no drama, no angst, and that's why the fans that backed her ultimatley persuded Lee and Gerry Orway to focus on her with the intention of pairing Peter up with MJ.

No arguing there, but she's the golden calf to some who were reading when she died. They're stubbornly sticking to it like... oh...Mary Jane fans. This is what I'm saying. The stories they're telling are great. If sales drop too much, BAM, the marriage is back. Or Ben Reilly. Or Eddie Brock as Spider-man. You never know with comic companies.

When the co-creator of Spider-Man knows what's best for his character, then it's hard for those who havent "gotten over Gwen", a contemptable drama queen at best, to have much of an argument.

Actually, Stan signed off on and blessed the weird annulment. He only changed because his readership, which stands alone from those who read the floppies, asked him to bring it back.

Black Cat never had a chance. She was a criminal, she would never entirely change, and above all else, she was obviously a rebound chick for MJ. Peter settling for Felicia would prove a slap in the face to his morals and principles to the reader

Of course not, but it wouldn't have mattered. Her whole point was that temptation, once that was gone, she ceased to be useful as a character.

Peter and MJ are the definitive couple. Thery had the better writing, they had the better drama, and there just more down-to-earth than Reed and Sue, who are almost unrelatable without kids due to their less-than-reallistic lifestyle, all of that "ordinary" stuff was given to Johnny and Ben.

I'd argue on the better writing. Mary Jane has been a szchiophrenic character for a long, long time. Go back and actually read those old issues. Start from the beginning, I'm pretty sure they still have the Spider-Man Chronological on torrent somewhere. Prior to getting married, she's left, dated Harry, declined Peter's proposal, dated Flash, left again, married Peter. Since they've been married, she's been a supermodel, she's been a housewife, Peter's hit her, she's had part of an affair, took up smoking and dropped it again, became a psychology student, became a model again, "died" and she's left twice off the top of my head.

The best Mary Jane has been in two titles: Ultimate Spider-Man and Mary Jane Love Spider-Man.


I'll agree here. D.C did the smart thing and replaced an established, popular Flash with another established, popular Flash.

Hate it, and see no reason for Barry Allen to return, but Johns writes good stories. Same with Hal Jordan. Kyle Rayner is my Green Lantern, but I pick up the main title because Johns' is doing excellent Green Lantern stories, just with the wrong Lantern in my opinion.

Peter doesnt have that luxery sadly. If Uncle Ben had been Spidey before him, I'd guarantee you'd see him in the coustume right now:thumbs:

Oh God no.

Turning him into Lex Luthor, was an appealing short-term concept that they stretched out to ludicroussness. It's no longer beleivable

Turning him into Obidiah Stane lately hasnt helped either.

If you can't write THE GREEN GOBLIN, don't write him at all.

Ellis' Thunderbolts had some of the best Osborn in awhile. The "New Ways to Die" arc continued this.

There's nothing recognisible about Spidey or any of his supporting cast in BND whatsoever. Again, proving that the current crop of writers can't cut it and have to break every character in order to do anything fresh with them. If that's what it takes to tell "great" Spider-Man stories again..then no, there not writing Spider-Man

Peter Parker is Spider-Man. He works for a newspaper as a photographer. His superhero life frequently conflicts with his personal relationships.

Yeah, that's pretty much BND Spider-Man. You'd rather Aunt May do Doctor Octopus? Or not have any relationships at all?

Peter sold out his wife, his ideals, his responsiblity, and his whole character to implement the retcon we see now. That isnt what Spider-Man is about, and BND CERTAINGLY isnt Spider-Man in any shape or form. I don't think some people who like it generally have read Spidey as dilligently as they claim. I think there just accept anything with the name "Spider-Man" on the title...a problem with a lot of Marvel's titles and "readership" these days

Again, I'm saying it is, and you hate the road that got us here so much that you may be blind to it.

I read my comics in the store before purchase to decide, and I'm buying alot more Spider-Man than I have in a long time. (Since JMS' first arc) Hated OMD, and swore off the Spider-Man titles like most of you. But then I actually tried them, and they're pretty damn good. And when they're not, I can skip that month, and get a whole new arc and creative team next month.

Quesada is a fan of Spider-Girl and respects it so much, he even called it the "natural continuity"...I think I'll settle for that since it's the only place where the Peter and MJ I knew, the Peter and MJ who got their happy ending, are allowed to be who they really are, all whilst mentoring a fresh new character with her own problems, supporting cast, and story.

I tired of DeFalco's storylines after awhile, but I support the continued publishing of the title.

Ultimate Spider-Man is still the best of the couple in my opinion.

I'm more pissed off people "live with it" rather than do anything about it. Complaciency will kill this industry more than the shock-value

Even if things always go back to the way things were, prolonging that for as long as you can is even better.

It's not complacency, it's enjoyment. I did not enjoy the title prior to OMD, I do enjoy certain arcs and creative teams of BND. Simple.
 
If you intend to move Spider-man back to the flagship idea, to the mainstream, there is no marriage.

Do you seriously beleive what you post?

Most casual fans and readers arent as dumb as you're assuming. They DO read reprints and/or back-issues or "Essential" TPBs or the ASM CD-ROM, they'll KNOW Peter and MJ's story leads to marraige...hell, most "casuals" consider the deal with Mephisto to be the dumbest thing Marvel ever did and, even if they don't complain, they get a good chuckle out of how desperate and irrelevant the franchise has become.


Spider-Man is a complete story these days...anyone with a brain knows that. He got married, had a kid, he's a parent. Simple equation, anything else is a just a menegerie of what ifs and could bes.

The marraige is still actively promoted by Stan in the Newspaper strip and Spider-Girl by Marvel. Despite Quesada's insane ideas....It's effectivly never left

Peter married a clone of MJ in the FOX series while the real one was trapped in limbo, but the marraige still legally counted seeing as nobody saw the clone MJ die and Peter recovered the genuine article off-screen in time for Spider-Man Unlimited (said to be canon with the FOX series). That marks TWO series which feature a married Spidey

Peter was going to propose to MJ in Spider-Man 3, promoting the idea of a marraige for future movies (and a perfect oppertunity to marry the characters in the comics again, earning a major boost in circulation)

The Spectacular Spider-Man features the "iconic" high school Peter, where you pretty much know Peter and MJ will become a couple and it's hinted quite delicatly. Howver, since we know that won't happen for a while, it allows a less angsty, mature Gwen to shine as Peter's current interest.

It's version of MJ is the best one we've had next to the MTV Spider-Man version, she sticks to the background as an anchor and isnt entirely in the midst of the action.

If anything, were I to constantly promote a definitive Spidey, I'd vouch for the iconic Lee/Ditko ideal...anything outside of High School should be a small play on the DeFalco ideal...marraige, or "getting there with hiccups", but overall, the Spider-Man movies arent a very faithful representation of the mythos anyway, and I've longed for a reboot that goes back to the high school element or does something outside of it properly.

And no, we are not holding on to the restoration of the marraige "stubborningly" like MJ fans. We are holding on to the TRUE spirit of Spider-Man like...oh...Spider-Man fans.

Rest assured though, when people think "Peter and MJ beyond High School" in any medium, they think of the marraige, or are waiting for the marraige. It's a forgone conclusion.

The stories they're telling are great.

There not true to the characters, so there not great.

If sales drop too much, BAM, the marriage is back. Or Ben Reilly. Or Eddie Brock as Spider-man. You never know with comic companies.

Tom Brevoot's already confirmed there's a new Clone Saga on the way

Mac Gargan's currently the "Dark Reign" Spidey....he's getting his own mini-series. Unfortuatly, it's written by a noted hack rather than a big-leauge guy

Actually, Stan signed off on and blessed the weird annulment. He only changed because his readership, which stands alone from those who read the floppies, asked him to bring it back.

The plan was ALWAYS to go back to the marraige in the newspaper strip...there's practically a signed confession from Stan's editor confirming this in JANUARY to certain publishers and readers. Stan kept the marraige in the newspaper strip THROUGHOUT 2008.

Jesus Christ, get your facts straight.

Stan is a well-known spinster and a consumate professional "yes man" whenever he's on Marvel's good side (or have you forgotten his multiple lawsuits?). Do you honestly think that if he refused to support Marvel throughout this mess, that he would be writing back-up strips for almost every 600th issue there peddling in the next few months? Stan's the anti-Alan Moore.

Stan also came to endorse Aunt May's death during The Clone Saga after being initially pissed off with it..the man bends in the wind, his opinion means a lot, but it's fuelled mainly by his moods or his own agendas.

BND was still an untested idea at the time...to practically disown Marvel's big push for the ASM title in a bi-monthly format with a piss-poor status quoe no fan was supporting would have made things worse. Marvel craved publicity with this stunt.

As it stands, the publicity came and went, BND is not the success that it was supposed to be, the marraige is back in the newspaper strip as always intended...and it won't be long before, as you say, the marraige, Ben Reily, lions, tigers, and bears oh my come sweeping in to recover the missing portions of the fanbase.

I'm expecting it to go monthly again in a year or two as well....as that can also be excused as contributing to the sales bleed

I'd argue on the better writing. Mary Jane has been a szchiophrenic character for a long, long time. Go back and actually read those old issues.

I did. There's nothing there that doesnt define the MJ I know. She was always the non-judgemental fun-loving pillar of support for everyone who wasnt part of anything dramatic and was thus a breath of fresh air to readers to the point they chose her over Gwen

Harry would have went off the deep end anyway, MJ knew about his drug use and sensibly cut herself off from him. She later regretted leaving Harry in the lurch (and she also started making a play for Peter, some suspect she'd been encouraged by Aunt May at this point to pursue him harder as his relationship with Gwen began to disintergrate prior to her death)

Prior to getting married, she's left, dated Harry, declined Peter's proposal

She declined because she wasnt ready. She left because Dennis O'Neil had mandated that she be removed from the equation because Gerry wanted her to take over Aunt May's role, and to hit this home, he killed off Aunt May for the very first time. O'Neil brought back May in ASM Issue 200 and MJ didnt return for several years until Roger Stern took over

Peter's hit her

Weak argument. He didnt know it was her, and she forgave him afterwards

she's had part of an affair

That was against her will (I'm assuming you're talking about Johnathan Ceaser), and Peter forgave her....there was that incident with Miguel O'Hara switching bodies with Peter, but that doesnt count.

As for Felicia...the only reason she stopped being interesting was because a mandate kiboshed her relationship with Flash Thompson. In the MC2 canon, she married him, had kids, but then realized she was gay.

The best Mary Jane has been in two titles: Ultimate Spider-Man and Mary Jane Love Spider-Man.

Pretty much the same MJ I've always read then.

The best MJ is the MC2 version from Spider-Girl...which is, pretty much, the MJ I was raised on up until 1998...a succesful buisnesswoman and mother with the psychological advantage that Tom was developing when he was kicked off the title.
 
Last edited:
Do you seriously beleive what you post?
Always.

Most casual fans and readers arent as dumb as you're assuming. They DO read reprints and/or back-issues or "Essential" TPBs or the ASM CD-ROM, they'll KNOW Peter and MJ's story leads to marraige...hell, most "casuals" consider the deal with Mephisto to be the dumbest thing Marvel ever did and, even if they don't complain, they get a good chuckle out of how desperate and irrelevant the franchise has become.

Spider-Man is a complete story these days...anyone with a brain knows that. He got married, had a kid, he's a parent. Simple equation, anything else is a just a menegerie of what ifs and could bes.
Again ask the casual and mainstream and this will not be what they tell you. They tell you about Spider-Man, Auny May, Uncle Ben, Mary Jane, Green Goblin, Venom. They won't tell you about Mayday Parker, Ben Reilly, Hornet, Prodigy, or any of extended universe of Spider-Man. They sure as hell probably know jack-all about the Mephisting.

Here's a test, pick a large event, say a basketball game. Football game, glee club, whatever. Ask them what Spider-Man is to them. If any of them mentions Mephisto, I'd be shocked.

The marraige is still actively promoted by Stan in the Newspaper strip and Spider-Girl by Marvel. Despite Quesada's insane ideas....It's effectivly never left

Great, so the Spider-Man you love is being published. Why the ire?

Peter married a clone of MJ in the FOX series while the real one was trapped in limbo, but the marraige still legally counted seeing as nobody saw the clone MJ die and Peter recovered the genuine article off-screen in time for Spider-Man Unlimited (said to be canon with the FOX series). That marks TWO series which feature a married Spidey

Two out of seven series is not really in your favor. And seeing as MJ was a footnote in Unlimited at best, I'm disinclined to count. What use is a married Spider-Man if you don't do anything with it?

Peter was going to propose to MJ in Spider-Man 3, promoting the idea of a marraige for future movies (and a perfect oppertunity to marry the characters in the comics again, earning a major boost in circulation)
My thought as well, hence I'm riding out these excellent stories until they revert everything.

The Spectacular Spider-Man features the "iconic" high school Peter, where you pretty much know Peter and MJ will become a couple and it's hinted quite delicatly. Howver, since we know that won't happen for a while, it allows a less angsty, mature Gwen to shine as Peter's current interest.

It's version of MJ is the best one we've had next to the MTV Spider-Man version, she sticks to the background as an anchor and isnt entirely in the midst of the action.
In agreement here. She hews closer to the Ultimate version, she is good in my opinion.

If anything, were I to constantly promote a definitive Spidey, I'd vouch for the iconic Lee/Ditko ideal...anything outside of High School should be a small play on the DeFalco ideal...marraige, or "getting there with hiccups", but overall, the Spider-Man movies arent a very faithful representation of the mythos anyway, and I've longed for a reboot that goes back to the high school element or does something outside of it properly.
I prefer the Empire State University era. That was perfection in my mind.

And no, we are not holding on to the restoration of the marraige "stubborningly" like MJ fans. We are holding on to the TRUE spirit of Spider-Man like...oh...Spider-Man fans.
Again, I feel BND taken on it's own, is about as close as Marvel's gotten to the true spirit of Spider-Man is a very long time. Sure they kicked us in the nuts over and over again with the Sins Past, Back In Black, OMD trifecta, but BND is a loving caress.

Rest assured though, when people think "Peter and MJ beyond High School" in any medium, they think of the marraige, or are waiting for the marraige. It's a forgone conclusion.
Also in agreement. And the problem is it's a foregone conclusion in most media. When it's time to wrap it up. Finito.

Tom Brevoot's already confirmed there's a new Clone Saga on the way
Oh God.

Mac Gargan's currently the "Dark Reign" Spidey....he's getting his own mini-series. Unfortuatly, it's written by a noted hack rather than a big-leauge guy
I enjoy Gargan Venom as well by the way.

The plan was ALWAYS to go back to the marraige in the newspaper strip...there's practically a signed confession from Stan's editor confirming this in JANUARY to certain publishers and readers. Stan kept the marraige in the newspaper strip THROUGHOUT 2008.
Yes, I've seen the Roy Thomas quote.

Jesus Christ, get your facts straight.
http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/24/spider-man-newspaper-strip-revives-the-spider-marriage/

Stan Lee, “decid[ing] to bow to your letters,†has decided to write off the past five months as a dream, reuniting Spider-Man and Mary Jane as man and wife.

Stan said it. Not I.

Stan is a well-known spinster and a consumate professional "yes man" whenever he's on Marvel's good side (or have you forgotten his multiple lawsuits?). Do you honestly think that if he refused to support Marvel throughout this mess, that he would be writing back-up strips for almost every 600th issue there peddling in the next few months? Stan's the anti-Alan Moore.

Stan also came to endorse Aunt May's death during The Clone Saga after being initially pissed off with it..the man bends in the wind, his opinion means a lot, but it's fuelled mainly by his moods or his own agendas.

BND was still an untested idea at the time...to practically disown Marvel's big push for the ASM title in a bi-monthly format with a piss-poor status quoe no fan was supporting would have made things worse. Marvel craved publicity with this stunt.
I agree Stan goes where the wind blows.

As it stands, the publicity came and went, BND is not the success that it was supposed to be, the marraige is back in the newspaper strip as always intended...and it won't be long before, as you say, the marraige, Ben Reily, lions, tigers, and bears oh my come sweeping in to recover the missing portions of the fanbase.

I'm expecting it to go monthly again in a year or two as well....as that can also be excused as contributing to the sales bleed
I give it three years tops. They'll need to drop a couple of big changes to bring the numbers up, but dropping 0.5-1.0% per month means they'll have to change something in around that time. They may split it back into three titles, as they can't up the price to $3.99 on a weekly title.

I did. There's nothing there that doesnt define the MJ I know. She was always the non-judgemental fun-loving pillar of support for everyone who wasnt part of anything dramatic and was thus a breath of fresh air to readers to the point they chose her over Gwen
If Gwen was still alive, I doubt the outcome would've been the same fanwise. They had pretty much played out their relationship in all their permutations and marriage was all that was left. Avoiding marriage and his preference of MJ is why Conway offed her.

She declined because she wasnt ready. She left because Dennis O'Neil had mandated that she be removed from the equation because Gerry wanted her to take over Aunt May's role, and to hit this home, he killed off Aunt May for the very first time. O'Neil brought back May in ASM Issue 200 and MJ didnt return for several years until Roger Stern took over
The problem with her is because she's *not* really central to the essence of Spider-Man, and so writers and editors go back and forth on whether to keep her around or not. Thus her characterization is all across the board, with later writers having to go back, retcon, and explain away inconsistencies.

Weak argument. He didnt know it was her, and she forgave him afterwards
Are we speaking of the same issue? Spectacular #226 during the Clone Saga?

That was against her will (I'm assuming you're talking about Johnathan Ceaser), and Peter forgave her....there was that incident with Miguel O'Hara switching bodies with Peter, but that doesnt count.
I'm speaking of Jason Jerome. It was in Spectacular. I don't remember Peter ever finding out.

As for Felicia...the only reason she stopped being interesting was because a mandate kiboshed her relationship with Flash Thompson. In the MC2 canon, she married him, had kids, but then realized she was gay.
Never like that status quo. Preferred the crazy one in love with Spider-Man, but who didn't care about Peter.

Pretty much the same MJ I've always read then.

The best MJ is the MC2 version from Spider-Girl...which is, pretty much, the MJ I was raised on up until 1998...a succesful buisnesswoman and mother with the psychological advantage that Tom was developing when he was kicked off the title.
Different strokes, but that is an excellent version of the character.
 
i've notice that most comic character starts to suck after they get hitched...

spidey and mj

Well the reason why Spidey's line started to go downhill a few years after he got married in the 80s had nothing to do with the marriage. Spidey's line started to go bad at that time for one reason: the 90's/TDK: Returns happened.
 
I think marraige in comics is a major test of how far a character can go dramaticly, and a test of writer's creativity. If they can't creativly continue to explore fresh ideas with the concept of family and overcoming obstacles, then, frankly, they have no right calling themselves writers, or have any right writing iconic characters.

Mysogomy, shades of grey, and defatist attitudes in comics are a much bigger problem than something educational and uplifiting like family values, heroism, selflessness, and marraige. Look at the track record of females that have been given the finger by Marvel and D.C over the last few years...there's been some brutal **** to the point I'm glad that there's been turnaround in recent years with an emphasis on marraige and parenting with several heroes.

oh that is very true
 
Well the reason why Spidey's line started to go downhill a few years after he got married in the 80s had nothing to do with the marriage. Spidey's line started to go bad at that time for one reason: the 90's/TDK: Returns happened.

That's about the size of it. That would describe why EVERY mainstream superhero comic went downhill. (Don't forget, the 80s happened, too!)
 
Marraige in comics is a better thing to read about that an unattainable loser fulfilling the needs of readers who are married. It says more about them than the characters.

I was raised on Peter and MJ as a married couple, so they were never a problem for me or anyone I've talked to on the subject. They ARE the definitive Marvel couple and the company face nightmares doing nothing with it other than angst it up or pretend it never happened...where as with The Fantastic Four, they use the family dynamic more positively

The Scott/Jean marraige hasnt been around for a while. Jean's dead/soon to be ressurected, and Emma is Scott's current interest (though how much of that is up to Scott or Jean giving him the push in "Here Comes Tommorow" is up to interpretation) I loved how they handled the triangle in Wolverine and the X-Men. I don't know if the marraige will resume if Jean is revived, but it's a good chance it will

Scott was never intended to come back after he married Madelyne by the way. Claremont admitted as much. His abandoning Madelyne to reunite with Jean gave him this darker side that his all-purpose "nice guy" role had been lacking, so he became MUCH easier to keep around afterwards

Spidey sucks without marraige. Ditko never wanted Peter to graduate high school for a good reason.

Instead of being "Archie-lite" forever, Stan graduated Peter and sent the characters on one-way courses to thier storylines being completly closed...which has now happened regardless of reboots and blunt denile.

To it's credit, the current crop of diversity, from USM to the newspaper strip, to developing the marraige without ALL the focus on Peter in Spider-Girl, hides the fracturing pretty well and allows them to grow and develop ideas.

Maybe you ought to be more pissed off Spidey GRADUATED let alone got married.

I thoroughly enjoyed Superman for years after he married Lois. I'm not enjoying it right now because the writing is **** and the remaining members of The Lanes are being turned into homicidal maniacs...plus I've never been a fan of bucketloads of active Kryptonians flying around

I think marraige in comics is a major test of how far a character can go dramaticly, and a test of writer's creativity. If they can't creativly continue to explore fresh ideas with the concept of family and overcoming obstacles, then, frankly, they have no right calling themselves writers, or have any right writing iconic characters.

Mysogomy, shades of grey, and defatist attitudes in comics are a much bigger problem than something educational and uplifiting like family values, heroism, selflessness, and marraige. Look at the track record of females that have been given the finger by Marvel and D.C over the last few years...there's been some brutal **** to the point I'm glad that there's been turnaround in recent years with an emphasis on marraige and parenting with several heroes.

I remember when DC would regularly kill off the girlfriends, when the relationships started heading in the marriage direction.

In regards to the stuff about Stan Lee. To be honest, I think he's earned the right to be that way.
 
batman must never get hitched or else he wont be a badass anymore in my book...

Batman DID get hitched to Talia in "Son of the Demon" back whern Damien was conceived...it's implied the wedding was annauled later, but this is TALIA we're talking about...she sets herself up as Bruce's psycho "everything"
 
Last edited:
I still hate most of comic book fans and majorally keep out of these things but...

I still don't get why people are making a big fuss about Peter/MJ marriage begoning, they've broken up before several times and people seem to think that it's not going to be changed back again at some point. Just ride out what's going on now, people are generally more than happy to read alternative universe versions, what makes this any different apart from being in the main comic for now?
 

how to help support popgeeks, popgeeks, pop geeks

Latest News & Videos

Latest News

Back
Top