Seriously? I won't pick on someone for taste. sometimes a show's sense of humor or characters just doesn't click with you. That's fine.
But Fourze literally had more plot in both its introductory arc and Meteor arcs alone than Wizard has had in its entire first thirty-odd episodes. In fact, Fourze had completed two plot arcs by this point in the show, while absolutely none of the questions raised in Wizard have been developed or answered.
If you simply find raising questions entertaining, that's fine, but there's a big difference between dangling a bunch of plot threads and having any sort of developed narrative. While I'd like to be proved wrong, I imagine most of the questions Wizard has raised will go unanswered by the show's end, just do to all the time the show is choosing to waste.
This is just a case of Fourze's villain not being a type of villain you liked. Sagittarius was a well-done honorable, human villain who is following a very specific agenda. He does not necessarily view the hero as his foe, and killing Fourze would not have advanced his plan until the very end of the series (where he tries it and fails). Gamou's just not going to behave like the Phantoms, who are clearly a more traditional type of Rider villain.
Maybe you should actually watch the movie? Because Gamou didn't actually have all twelve switches in the film. The Replica Horoscope Switches were, IIRC, used by Inga Blink to create a distraction so she and Black Knight could get aboard the shuttle. Gamou is consistently opposed to what the villains of the film are doing, since it is counter to his personal agenda, and he chooses to help Fourze beat them at the end of the movie.
Right, and you're just proving my point. There is no version of Fourze, no matter how good it was, that you would've liked. You clearly just have problems with what the story wanted to be about. On the other hand, Wizard is suitably to your tastes that you can enjoy it despite it not being very well-done at all.
