FreedomR8G6B1
New Member
i don't think i can stomach this......
shang tsung does not = heihachi...
I'm just asking out on a limb...did you say this also...
"Liu Kang does not = Gen?"
i don't think i can stomach this......
shang tsung does not = heihachi...
Did I see Paul in there? I think i saw him for a second.
Well, King isn't there.
Xiaoyu? I didn't noticed her, same with Hwoarang.
Why Marshall Law not Forest Law?
I'm just asking out on a limb...did you say this also...
"Liu Kang does not = Gen?"
As longs as the fights are cool...
King has a cameo, he's played by Dave Batista.
So, will this is be released on DVD or theaters?
Well the reasoning behind no Lei Wulong is because they originally wanted some of the fighters the characters were based on to play their characters. And they got pretty close too. Obviously getting Jackie Chan would have been difficult but not impossible since (at the time) he was attached to the now dead Soul Calibur project.
Honestly this trailer looks pretty damn good but the really low budget is very apparent. The only thing thats awry really is giving Christie a major role, not that its a big problem or anything but there are many other female characters that are more relevant to Jin's plight than Christie. Like Xiaoyu or Lili.
You're condemning the movie for giving characters random goatees? You might as well condemn The Dark Knight for having a brunette Bruce Wayne.
Maybe its just the quality of the trailer but Anton Kasabov as Dragunov looks nothing like a pretty boy and looks pretty damn close to his character. And the bald guy? That was Steve Fox, not Miguel. Miguel is played by Roger Huerta who is very much Spanish and has a very small role and was in the Trailer for maybe two seconds. Why is Steve bald? Probably because Luke Goss couldn't grow his hair in time for the shoot and they couldn't afford a believable wig.
And the story line is Tekken 3's story, loosely based of course especially considering the incredibly small budget.
Well its obvious that you're judging the movie on how close it gets the characters appearance. Which has nothing to do with the story. And obviously the story isn't the important aspect here. Hell you don't play Tekken for its transparent story in the first place. Tekken's always been about fighting, and thats exactly what this movie is about. They wouldn't have casted a team of martial artists instead of actors if they were going to put an emphasis on story.
WRONG. alot of people i know have enjoyed tekken for the story up until it went out the window in 5 and 6. IS IT THAT MUCH OF A PROBLEM TO ASK FOR? the last fighting game movie that was supposed to be all fighting, king of fighters, blew chunks after all was said and done. the story of the prodigal son, kazuya, returning to bust his old man's ass, his supposed moment of weakness with jun, everyone getting thrown off cliffs and volcanos, jin coming out of nowhere to get revenge on ogre and busting his grandad's ass because he's envious the devil gene skipped a generation, and lee who's basically the stepson who crap for not wanting to beat the crap out of his adoptive dad... i love it. is it so wrong to ask for alittle substance with my mindless action? my pops introduced me to tekken when i was 11, i loved it ever since.... this isn't really tekken at all. but i've probably wated my words on you, haitien.... you're a snob about everything if no one sees it the way you do..... so whatever, I won't be seeing it, and if i do, it'll be at someone else's expense.
and i LIKED the dark knight, you dick.
As longs as the fights are cool...