Women outside my race tend to stand out more than the ones who are the same race as I. Not to say that the ones of my race are in no way attractive to me though. Even so, I think I can see myself marrying within my race more than I see myself marrying outside of my race.
Meh, I think I'm just glad I don't live in Louisiana.
It was this super segregationalist concept that came about during the time of the American Civil War that said if you had any African American heritage whatsoever, you were to be considered a "negro." Everybody in your family could have been Scotch-Irish except for one great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather and if it was proven you could still have been sold as property.
Since when do you need to be married to give births anyway? Not marrying those couples won't really prevent a child from coming into the world if the parents want to.
Since when do you need to be married to give births anyway? Not marrying those couples won't really prevent a child from coming into the world if the parents want to.
Hopefully this won't derail the topic, but to answer your question, some just prefer to have kids within a marriage. The aforementioned couple probably won't let not being able to get married get in their way of having kids, but I was just giving you the insight you were asking for.
It was this super segregationalist concept that came about during the time of the American Civil War that said if you had any African American heritage whatsoever, you were to be considered a "negro." Everybody in your family could have been Scotch-Irish except for one great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather and if it was proven you could still have been sold as property.
Wow...I have never heard of that before. Shows how useful U.S. History is huh? lol
Man...I am just glad this still doesn't exist. My family is basically all white, has married nothing other then white...well, guess who got the looks for bringing over a dark skinned asian...that would be me...:buttrock: