Yeah, Fang, Shinkenger was serious. It sure wasn't flowers and daises.
I agree Shinkengers was serious, but at times it was funny.
Yeah, Fang, Shinkenger was serious. It sure wasn't flowers and daises.
You're right. It was a boring toy commercial and a broken record as far as characterizations went. "Samurai" was a misleading title.
It doesn't? I sure as hell see it used often as a response to criticisms.
Well I don't accept that, and I don't enjoy the shows that overly emphasize so-called "kiddy" material.
Name me an example of when such material really enhanced the story.
Name me an example of when such material really enhanced the story.
Thing is even with all It's merch. They still didn't make them the "main" part of the show.
So what is too you, a fun toy commercial?
Case in point. What do you consider unacceptable "kiddy" material, if I may ask?
To be on the original topic, do you mean stuff like how all the different Engines that kept popping up and how they interacted with the cast as a whole made everyone more dynamic or gave a better idea of what made them tick?
Or did you mean stuff like... I dunno, the Gaiark turning some kid's little mascot dog into a horrible monster that rips out and eats the kids entrails? Since, y'know, dark, horrible violence must make a story "deeper" right?
The story in what?
I mean, most of this stuff comes from Doraemon, and that's a classic.
A lot of the material in recent Sentais and even Riders that dumb down things.
Which a sarcastic remark like that, you clearly have an incorrect notion of what folks who don't like the oversaturation of wackiness in tokus want.