The rest of the country is governed by similar laws. The problem only starts with people who can't find jobs for an extended period. Under the Obama plan, care for these people would be subsidized.
Sure they have to offer it, but that doesn't mean they have to make it easy for their employees to get. Take wal-mart for example. Also why is it that some people are in this thread and not really taking part. They are just shooting in stupid one liners that have nothing to do with the topic at all.
Taken from
http://wakeupwalmart.com/facts/
Wal-Mart and Health Care
Download the Wal-Mart and Health Care flyer - PDF
Wal-Mart's health care plan fails to cover nearly 700,000 employees
* Wal-Mart reports that its health insurance covers only 50.2% of their employees. Wal-Mart has nearly 1.4 million US employees. [UFCW analysis of Wal-Mart health plan, March 2008]
Wal-Mart's health care plan is too costly
* If an average full-time Wal-Mart employee chooses the least expensive family coverage plan, they would have to spend over 20% of their income before the health insurance provided any reimbursement.[ EBRI Issue Brief October 2007]
* An average full time Wal-Mart Associate faces a serious family health issue. They have to pay the entire out-of-pocket maximum for the least expensive health plan, which adds up to pay 53% of their income. [ EBRI Issue Brief October 2007]
Wal-Mart's health insurance falls far short of the industry average
* On average, large firms (1,000 or more workers) insure 65% of their employees. If Wal-Mart was to minimally reach the average coverage rate, Wal-Mart would cover an additional 210,000 workers. [ EBRI Issue Brief October 2007]
Wal-Mart forces employees to rely on public assistance to cover health care costs
* In 21 of 23 states where data is available, Wal-Mart forces more employees to rely on taxpayer-funded health care than any other employer. ["Disclosures of Employers Whose Workers and Their Dependents are Using State Health Insurance Programs, Good Jobs First, June 26, 2007]
Wal-Mart admits public assistance is a "better value"
* Despite over $12 billion in profits, President and CEO Lee Scott admits, "In some of our states, the public program may actually be a better value - with relatively high income limits to qualify, and low premiums". [Transcript Lee Scott Speech, 4 May 2005]