I don't know if this thread will be approved by admins, but WTH...
I don't like any of them...Frank because he practicaly caused the Dark Age of comics which I would really like to end already!
and Mark (I voted for him) would be way better if he's a movie writer (he and Michael Bay are made for each other)...bunch of explosions, bunch of wisecracking gritty characters, very little character depth and very stupid dialogues and pop culture refferences. Also he uses lot of politics and realism which if you ask me doesn't belong in super-hero comic books
Both have their problems but Frank Miller wrote some great stories once, can't deny that just because of what he and they have become. With Mark Millar on the other hand, I just can't forgive Civil War...
The king of crappy over the top grimdark vs the king of making "MTV"-esque comics for the bros. I'm gonna go with the latter Mark Millar. He just hasn't done anything I liked that much, okay I did like Wanted a bit but thats just one. As compared to Frank Miller sure he has some stupid ideas and even stupider movies but hey he's done some great comics I've liked in the past.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.