Faiz or Blade?

[HaiTien78]

LOOK AT THE PRODUCTION VALUE OF MMPR, AND THEN LOOK AT THE PRODUCTION VALUE OF KRDK. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see which one is higher, so again, your argument is moot. Why? Because even if MMPR DID have more money than KRDK, it doesn't change the fact that they're both low-budget, so you're comparing a low budget show... to ANOTHER low budget show.

And I LOVE the bolded. And I'm the one that needs to learn reading comprehension? HA!



I have a black-and-white view? Your entire argument has been "More money = higher quality, less money = lower quality." I have disagreed with that, yet I'm the one with the black-and-white view? Okay...

You just contradicted your own statement you smug bloke. You're saying MMPR had a much greater budget than KRDK and then you say its okay to compare the two? You really are attempting to compare middle class to poverty. Not only do you need reading comprehension, you need writing comprehension too. And no its not comparing low budget to low budget, its comparing low budget to very VERY low budget. Here lets use this picture to compare the budget that each company had to work with their respective shows.

Again you read what you want to read. You really are an ignorant bloke that sees things in black and white. Stop stop right there and take a double take buddy, read what I said. I am using words like probably, the odds, chances, most likely . I am not stating "ITS EITHER THIS OR THAT". I am saying "if its like this it will most likely be like that but its not unheard of that it might end up like the opposite instead". Quit trying to exaggerate so you can "win" this argument. And to quote Christian Bale, fucksake you're amateur. Think before you post, don't exaggerate that makes your entire argument moot and makes you look like an ignorant prick.

Now are you going to think before you post, read everything what I have to say, and actually try to have a good argument? Or are you going to continue to exaggerate my posts for your own little pissing contest? If you choose the latter then lets agree to disagree and bid each other good day.

 

[HaiTien78]

Accidental double post, ignore this.

 

[Mr. Underachiever]

You just contradicted your own statement you smug bloke. You're saying MMPR had a much greater budget than KRDK and then you say its okay to compare the two?

I didn't say ANYTHING of the sort. I'm still laughing at the fact that I'm supposedly the one that needs reading comprehension.

I am using words like probably, the odds, chances, most likely . I am not stating "ITS EITHER THIS OR THAT". I am saying "if its like this it will most likely be like that but its not unheard of that it might end up like the opposite instead". Quit trying to exaggerate so you can "win" this argument.

Remember KRDK is a very low budget show, low budget means obviously lower quality. You're a flaming moron if you except high quality from a very low budget show. How can you expect basics of a "quality" show when there is very minimal money in the first place?

If the budget is very low, the quality of everything will also be very low.

Those are your quotes from your initial post. I did not edit them in any way.

Yeah, I see a lot "probably's" and "most likely's" in them. Yet, somehow, I'm "twisting" your argument. I'm "exaggerating" it so I can win. Yeah, okay...

The rest of your post is nothing more than ad hominems, so I'm not gonna waste my time with it.

 

[HaiTien78]

I didn't say ANYTHING of the sort.

Really now?

Why? Because even if MMPR DID have more money than KRDK, it doesn't change the fact that they're both low-budget, so you're comparing a low budget show... to ANOTHER low budget show.

Now you're just making this too easy.

Those are your quotes from your initial post. I did not edit them in any way.

Yeah, I see a lot "probably's" and "most likely's" in them. Yet, somehow, I'm "twisting" your argument. I'm "exaggerating" it so I can win. Yeah, okay...

The rest of your post is nothing more than ad hominems, so I'm not gonna waste my time with it.

Well there is no denying that those paragraphs lacked the probably's and most likely's for that I apologize for conveying the wrong message to you. That was a screw up on my part then. But yet again you pick and choose what you want to say. Lets bring up my posts where I did use those statements shall we?

Ugh again learn some reading comprehension. Yes there is a chance a cheap writer can be good, but its more likely that cheap writers are crappy. Since well the better they are and the more experienced, the higher their "payroll" is. And yes their can be new cheap writers that write good but the odds of new, inexperienced writers being good are pretty low. If you want to argue how the whole process of screenplay writing works try learning about it through a qualified person first before you can speak up about

You misunderstand pal, it has a low budget so don't expect anything quality. I did not say "HURRR IT HAS A LOW BUDGET IT WILL NEVER EVER BE GOOD". Try some reading comprehension next time, it'll help you in life.

Yes its possible that a very low budget show can be good, but again learn some reading comprehension, I did not say none of them are good, I said you shouldn't expect all of them to be good.

Ah so you choose to agree to disagree, a wise choice, well actually if you think of the context...ah nevermind it wouldn't interest a fellow like you. Now go on run along now and beware your wandering thoughts oh nescient one.

 

[KingRanger]

Haitian why are you so caught up on winning and losing an argument. I mean you vehemently attack people during arguments, and I always see you bring in the "are you trying to win/lose" into it.

 

[Mr. Underachiever]

Getting back on topic, if you REALLY think you can do a better job than what Dragon Knight did, why not just do Ryuki and we can REALLY see if it's any better?

 

[HaiTien78]

Haitian why are you so caught up on winning and losing an argument. I mean you vehemently attack people during arguments, and I always see you bring in the "are you trying to win/lose" into it.

Sorry to bump up this topic here, you can view it as an attack if you want but usually my posts in an argument get condescending when the point goes over their head and act very pompous about it (lemme guess I'm one to talk right?) IE I call out ignorance and smuggness as I see it. To me an argument is about debating, not about winning or losing, its about two sides getting their point into the heads of the other. When I see someone use a tactic you'd see from a "Haha I'll win this forum war with this post" kind of person I call it out.