Anyway, are you guys going to take the stupid reviews for truth? Seriously, when the movie comes out, get off your fat ass and see the damn movie yourself. Who cares what others think.
Seriously, today's reviews are by no one other than idiots wanting to find something else to complain about, because it doesn't match the standards of one of their "classics". They just can't learn to step out of their box and enjoy what the hell is on the screen, and appreciate the effort that went into the film. And I don't care how reputatable the reveiwer is. It's complete garbage.
Long story short: Anyone who is willing to take a review as truth is an idiot. Watch it yourself.
Like I said earlier, most of my expectations and fears came from what I've seen of the movie, my knowledge of the screenplay, and my knowledge of the director. Snyder's already shown his incompetence with the material and shown his willing to cut plot points in favor of his stupid extended 300 gore and slow mo. He's shown his understanding of the material is pretty much equivalent of a High School jock, like lets use the Ozymandias for an example in interviews he's stated something on the lines of "Well when I read the ending I was like thats it? When are they gonna kill this bad guy?" Which if you know the material none of that would really apply and wasn't the intention. Ozymandias is the antagonist, you get the feeling he's the antagonist throughout the whole comic, but just that a feeling and it isn't painfully obvious. But the point is not that he revealed as the antagonist but there's heroism in his acts. Now what Snyder did with him judging from his look, feel, dialogue, and just the general direction he took Ozy in is pretty much this "HURRR HE'S THE BIG BAD GUY, MAKE HIM LOOK LIKE A BIG BAD GUY, MAKE ALL HIS CHARACTER SONGS DARK AND EVIL, HE'S EVIL EVIL EVIL". Thats what I am talking about with expectations, and thats just one example, I can go on from just my offhand knowledge of Snyder and just from the general direction of the film but I don't want to turn this post into one big LiveJournal worthy rant.
Besides you're taking things to extremes, sure people can set up expectations that a film will suck or be the best thing since sliced bread, but does it necessarily mean said people will definitely see or not see the film?
No, contrary to popular belief.
tl;dr there's nothing wrong with having expectations even negative ones.
Well if all reviewers are "****" like you say then whats stopping something like Disaster Movie winning an Oscar? There's nothing wrong with being a critic and pointing out flaws, because if there's a problem with a movie and you're a reviewer guess what your job is? State the problem. See when reviewing, pretty much judging, the quality of a film you can't just "ignore" the problems a film has, that destroys the point of it all. But lets be fair, it does help if critics and reviewers can view a film on more than one viewpoint, from a professional viewpoint, from an average joe viewpoint, from a fan viewpoint, from a critic viewpoint, from a writer viewpoint, etc. Like lets use your Bayformers example, from the professional viewpoints yes Bayformers has a good deal of problems and a fan will probably cringe at all the changes and plotholes, but an average joe movie goer might still sit down and enjoy it.
And watch it with the last bit, you're kind of doing the same thing the reviewer did but from the opposite view point so the same could apply to you.
And about the two movies you mentioned, one wrong forum pretty much most people here aren't the enamored Bayformers or AvP haters that are so vibrant elsewhere. As for Bayformers it has good deal of problems but its still enjoyable from a movie goer standpoint. Don't give a rats ass about the AvP series so I don't particularly care about those movies.