You're fine with mediocre bullshit that is in steep sales decline, has Aunt May bonking Jameson's freshly ressurected mary-sue father, tons of regressed characterisation, Peter not remotley acting like Peter, and The Osborns switching from homicidal maniac goblins to glorified Power Rangers?
Whatever floats your boat, but BND is no shape or form true Spider-Man.
Regarding salesSales-wise it sits at around 60K, same as Captain America, one of the best titles Marvel publishes. I see no problem there.
Regarding sales, outside of random cases (see Captain America) and special events (new number #1, comic sales always fall. Spider-man remains in line with this, losing 0.5-1% per month.Regarding sales
- they are consistently falling.
- pre-OMD/BND, the 3 Spider-Man books combined were selling more than BND/OMD so sales wise, it has been a failure.
-most likely the current numbers for June and May are probably around 50k or less
The problems are of course:Spider-man remains in line with this, losing 0.5-1% per month.
But the number of mainline spider-man comics combined sells lower in the end post-OMD than it did pre-OMD and thats a failure businesswise especially since it was clearly intended to sell at 52 level numbers.Not really on your second point. The new Amazing sells lower than the old Amazing, but it sells higher than Sensational and Friendly did, and unlike the old Amazing actually comes out every month of the year.
No. Several factors to consider.Again, they're not as behind as you think. And if they are they'll switch it up. The economy probably hurt Marvel move than OMD did.