It's not comic elitism to want a series to play a bit more along the lines of the mythology on which it is supposed to be based
You DO realize the term "Mythology" isnt grounded in consistency right? MYTH can be reinterpreted. The instant something needs to be tweeked so it can be fresh and not just be even a LOOSE retread is when you start getting intrigued in where this can go and what more they can do
With the way some "fans" want everything to follow the same thing to a CERTAIN degre, they stifile creativity, and the result is the industry is what it is now...boring, dull retreads with no new charactersiations or ideas because nobody is taking any risks with what they have now.
You can't be precious over a mythology, it's subject to change, and that's how it ought to be.
I was fine with "No tights, no flights", it didnt detract, it fit the show, and it's actually more truer to Superman since he didnt initally fly AT ALL in the comics, he leaped tall bounds (which they exploited to great affect in the series). He started to fly in the Fliescher cartoons and that was adapted for the comics. Supes has never enjoyed more consistent success than prior to this besides Timm's series, and it proves the cape and the trappings arent needed at all. Does it stumble? Hell yeah, but it's it's own thing and has done some great things by TWEEKING something that is open to new ideas.
Look, I can hang with different versions of characters. Hell I've spent several posts defending Brave and Bold. But it is a reckless assumption to treat them like they're SO bendable they can't possibly break. You reach a point where it's not really those characters at all, just the names slapped onto something else entirely and the mythologies just used as a random grab-bag to dress up a generic teen soap and wrecking the character in the process.
Wrong. The mythology would stay the same, it'd just be interpreted SLOWLY and very differently, with the same results coming out of it. Same story, different timeline, happening at different places than they were. Characters DO act the same, but they start off as something else and BECOME them later. It's all a matter of being paitent and not being biased towards the SUCCESFUL forumula of high-school shannegans/monster of the week.
I don't like Birds of Prey for other reasons than it simply being a different Batman-style series, I didnt think it took too many chances, but it COULD have had legs and I wanted it to aqquire a second season so it could establish some direction other than the visual eye-candy, maybe iron out it's flaws, which the first season of Smallville likewise had in abundence but slowly fixed because it got that second season and then more.