While this definitely has my vote, it's unlikely to happen since it'll defeat Blake/Robin's purpose. Terry is definitely the best person to replace Bruce to wear the mantle of Batman, but so does Jean-Paul Valley... But the latter would leave a very dark open-ending since we all know how Jean-Paul treated his responsibility as Batman. Now that you mentioned it though, it would be better if Nolan just treated the Blake revelation in the ending as that of Terry instead of Robin, since it'll make sense for the mantle of Batman to be passed on to him instead of Robin/Nightwing (Though Dick Grayson did become Batman in "Battle of the Cowl", but Tim Drake's history is much more similar to Blake's), which would leave a lot of options for future spinoffs and to continue the Batman legacy.
Well Nolan said he's not doing anymore Batman movies, and even though Robin takes over at the end, the franchise will (eventually) be rebooted and to be honest, i'm not sure how interesting a Robin or Nightwing movie would be. Batman Beyond seems perfect to me
- People will be tired of Batman, we've had 7 movies of varying quality
- Batman Beyond allows them to keep a familiar franchise and put a completely fresh twist on things (set in the future, with a Blade Runner style
- Bruce Wayne will now be an older mentor, not the hero. And fans will still have an established character to get excited for
- The themes and stories pretty much write themselves (how has Gotham changed in the future? Did Bruce Wayne make a difference? What is his legacy? How does Alfred's death affect Bruce? How does Terry McGinnis handle this pressure?)
- And people forget, Terry McGinnis was a really interesting character. He was completely the opposite of Bruce, he loved to banter and make jokes, he tried to have an active social life and was a legitimate badass at the same time
- There's room for a lot more humor
- And if they want to, the can add the part where Terry is Bruce's biological son (but I didn't like that story)
Make it happen Hollywood :buttrock: