ct 04168 msgcrop resized 1784058407543

Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey: The Popgeeks Review

I have always loved Homer’s Odyssey. It was one of the few things I was forced to read in seventh grade that I didn’t outright hate. I LOVED being forced to read it! It’s thrilling and full of action, with a real emotional drive. I couldn’t put my ratty textbook wrapped in a cutout paper grocery bag down.

What I DON’T like being forced to do is sit for three hours. I have a self-imposed rule that if a movie can’t keep itself shorter than two hours and thirty minutes, I’ll wait for the streaming release. When I found out that Christopher Nolan, one of the few competent directors in today’s Hollywood, was making The Odyssey his next project, I was like “I’m THERE!” Then I thought “Wait a minute….what’s the runtime?”

Almost exactly three hours? Ugh, I had to think about this. I NEEDED to see this in a theater, I needed to feel every ocean wave and cyclops chomp, but again, I hate being in the same seat for 180 minutes. “Can’t you get up and stretch?” I can hear some of you asking. Sure, if you want to completely block the view of the person behind you. This violates Zeus’s Law (more on that later).

There’s also the fact that three hours is a giant chunk out of a busy day, and has to be carefully planned out. It’s not just the length of the movie that has to be factored in, it’s the previews, the wait FOR the previews, the trip from home and back home…and you’re looking at something closer to FOUR hours. At least I could be assured there would be no post-credits sequence, so I could just leave when the names started scrolling. They didn’t have sequel bait in 1117 BC.

I found the one and only spot in my schedule Homer’s epic could be squeezed into, and…..okay, this is my fifth paragraph about getting to the movie in what’s supposed to be a review of the movie itself. I need to get to the point, which is this: Was the sacrifice of all that valuable time, the complete numbing of my butt worth it? I would say….yes.

ct 54129 msg resized 1784058407542

At first I wasn’t sure. Like he did with Oppenheimer, Nolan chose to tell The Odyssey out of order. The story begins in a place where the story is traditionally three-fourths of the way done, and not with Odysseus himself. You barely see Matt Damon for the first 20 or 30 minutes of the film. Instead the initial focus is on Telemachus, his son, and Penelope, his wife. When we finally cut to Odysseus he’s at one of the LAST places on his journey, and he’s trying to remember how he got there. “You’re probably wondering how I got myself into this situation.”

At that point we get the Cyclops, and after THAT we get the Trojan Horse. The thing about Nolan is that, other than shuffling stories, he also prefers to tell very grounded ones. Look what he did to Batman. But with something like The Odyssey it’s utterly impossible to suck the fantastical elements out, right? Now he HAS to give us a fantasy, doesn’t he?

The stuff still happens. The magic is still there. But it’s as Nolan-y as it can get. The cyclops is more of a giant disfigured man (his design is great by the way, and it was a real practical puppet, no CGI). Circe, who in most interpretations is a gorgeous seductress with a palatial home, appears here as a homely woman in a shack. It’s worth noting though the piggie-fication of the soldiers still happens and it’s the most unsettling part of the film. How do you make THAT realistic-looking, you ask? Uhh, you’ll find out.

It has been pointed out by others that all the parts of the story that have to do with monsters, gods and magic are the flashback portions, so it could be interpreted as Odysseus being high on lotus and misremembering a bunch of stuff. And because it’s Nolan, that’s possible. But….that’s also NO FUN. So it’s not true!

ct 03414 resized 1784058407544

Other than the shuffling of the cards, Nolan didn’t change much. It’s The Odyssey, straight and true, no artificial colors, no GMOs, nothing added. With the exception of ONE thing. There’s an extra flashback sequence that appears toward the end that feels out of place because it is. You will know it when you see it. It’s Nolan trying to shoehorn some kind of moral realization into Odysseus’s character arc, and it doesn’t work, because if Odysseus learned this lesson back THEN, he wouldn’t be the cocky SOB he starts his voyage home as, the kind that gets cursed by Poseidon in the first place.

But…that’s the ONE thing that doesn’t work. Over time, I grew to understand and appreciate why Nolan was telling the story in the order he was. We had to get to know Telemachus and Penelope first because once the film gets the ball rolling with Odysseus, it doesn’t have many opportunities to cut back to his family. And that familial connection and love is the core of the story — it’s important above all else.

ct 38345cc msg resized 1784058407543

What is the goal of Odysseus? To get back home. Why does he want to go home? Because his wife and son are there. What’s in his way? EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD. The war takes him twelve years to win and he’s lost at sea for another eight, but you can’t feel that urgency if you can’t identify with his goals. That’s why it’s smart we get to know Penelope and Telemachus first. The longer it takes, the more Odysseus is in danger of losing them. Add to this, the man’s a KING. He has no shortage of enemies both at home and abroad, and if one of them wins, it’s not just the end of his life, but the downfall of an entire country.

That’s the essence of an epic, which Homer defined. High stakes and high rewards. Every struggle needs to feel real, and every victory needs to feel earned. And most importantly, the hero needs to stand triumphant in the end, to make the audience’s entire emotional investment worth it. When Odysseus finally takes Penelope in his arms, it’s gotta feel like the biggest fist-pump moment ever. “YEAH!”

I can confirm Nolan pulls that off, though the final portion of the story runs a bit too long and that extra sequence is a big reason. The Odyssey is literally a textbook example of how to weave a compelling story. It’s been filmed before and it will be filmed again. But probably not for a while, so don’t miss out on this decade’s one chance to see this awesome story realized on the big screen. Even if it takes three freakin’ hours to tell.

Join the club!

Video interviews, reviews, game news, and pure fandom - be the first to know!

Loading new replies...

D
DerryCarpenter

Membery

77 messages 0 likes

I totally get what you mean about The Odyssey. It's one of those classic tales that really captivates you once you get into it. I'm curious to see how Nolan approaches the source material. He's known for spinning narratives in unexpected ways, so I wonder how he'll tackle Odysseus's journey without losing the essence of the original. The epic nature of the story seems like a perfect match for his visual style. Did the review mention any standout performances or scenes that really brought it to life for you?

Reply Like

Avatar of Parvati
Parvati

I am a Billy Eilish in a world of Ariana Grandes

25 messages 0 likes

I was already planning to watch this, but now I am even more interested. I like that Nolan kept most of the original story instead of trying to reinvent everything. The way you described the family side makes it sound like the emotional parts are just as important as the action. Three hours is still a lot for me though. I usually start checking the time once a movie gets close to that length. If the ending really delivers, I can probably accept it. I also like that practical effects were used for the Cyclops. That makes me more excited than hearing about another CGI monster. I just hope the pacing stays strong because long movies can lose me if too many scenes feel slow.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Vic
Vic

KISS OF DEATH

287 messages 20 likes

I was worried this would be another movie where the visuals are amazing but the characters feel distant. After reading this, it sounds like the family relationship is really the center of everything, and that is what makes me want to watch it. I can deal with a slow start if the payoff is worth it. The only thing that still worries me is the runtime because sitting in a theater for three hours is not easy anymore. Even so, it sounds like this is one of those movies that people will be talking about for a long time, so I do not want to miss it.

Reply Like

Avatar of Eugenio
Eugenio

Member

345 messages 25 likes

Three hours is definitely a commitment, but this sounds like one of those movies that earns it. The biggest surprise here is hearing that the emotional side is just as important as the action. That is what usually makes an adventure memorable instead of just looking expensive. The practical Cyclops also sounds like a great choice because there are already too many CGI creatures in movies today.

Reply Like

Avatar of kermitfries
kermitfries

Froggy Afternoon

642 messages 16 likes

Nolan always seems to divide people, especially with the way he tells stories. Some viewers love putting everything together, while others just want events to happen in order. This sounds like one of those films where patience will probably be rewarded. That makes it even more interesting.

Reply Like

Avatar of King Bam
King Bam

Tower Climber

120 messages 5 likes

Matt Damon as Odysseus seemed like an unusual choice at first, but now there is some curiosity about how he handles the role. The emotional journey sounds just as important as the action scenes, which is exactly what this story needs. Hopefully the performances are as strong as everything else being described.

Reply Like

Avatar of Pura
Pura

New Member

29 messages 1 like

I have never read The Odyssey, so I was wondering if someone like me could still enjoy the movie. From what I understand, it sounds like the movie explains the emotional side well enough that you do not need to know every detail beforehand. I mainly care about good characters and a satisfying ending. If those parts are strong, then I can always go back and read the original story later. I think this might actually be a good introduction for people who missed it in school.

Reply Like