Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Here’s The First Teaser For Harry Potter And The Philosopher’s Stone

Like it or not, you’re old and it’s time to reboot a film franchise you grew up with. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, which unlike the original movie will use the British title of the book it’s based on, is set to premiere this Christmas on HBO and the time is quickly approaching.

You know the story by now. In his humble British home, Harry Potter is just a picked-on nobody with a weird forehead scar. But in reality, he’s a powerful wizard destined to save the world from a mad tyrant with no nose. He just needs lots of training first, so a giant drags him away to Hogwarts where he spend the next seven years prepping for a showdown with Volde–whoops, almost said it.

25 years ago Harry Potter was controversial, but only among specific religious sects who mistook its fantasy for devil worship (as they had a tendency to do). Several decades later, the shoe is on the other foot as the series is now shunned among liberal circles, due to its creator being a hardcore TERF who won’t stop yapping about how having trans people exist is a threat to women, or something. No transphobic material occurs in Harry Potter itself, but the series is going to be forever tainted with this, well after she’s dead.

Even with the controversy, Harry Potter is still one of the most valuable things Warner Bros owns, and they’re sparing no expense with both the sets and the gigantic cast. Dominic McLaughlin stars as the Boy Who Lived himself, alongside Arabella Stanton as Hermione Granger, Alastair Stout as Ron Weasley, John Lithgow as Albus Dumbledore, Janet McTeer as Minerva McGonagall, Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape, Nick Frost as Rubeus Hagrid, Rory Wilmot as Neville Longbottom, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Elijah Oshin as Dean Thomas, Tristan Harland as Fred Weasley, Gabriel Harland as George Weasley, Ruari Spooner as Percy Weasley, Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Finn Stephens as Vincent Crabbe, William Nash as Gregory Goyle, Warwick Davis as Filius Flitwick, and Sirine Saba as Pomona Sprout.

No, wait, I’m not done. There’s also Daniel Rigby as Vernon Dursley, Bel Powley as Petunia Dursley, Paul Whitehouse as Argus Filch, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge, Luke Thallon as Quirinus Quirrell, Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Amos Kitson as Dudley Dursley, Gracie Cochrane as Ginny Weasley, Richard Durden as Cuthbert Binns, Louise Brealey as Rolanda Hooch, Bríd Brennan as Poppy Pomfrey, Leigh Gill as Griphook, and Anton Lesser as Garrick Ollivander.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone premieres its first episode on HBO and HBO Max Christmas Day.

Join the club!

Video interviews, reviews, game news, and pure fandom - be the first to know!

Loading new replies...

Avatar of Justin J
Justin J

Active Member

1,714 messages 21 likes

The idea of rebooting Harry Potter reminds me of how I felt when I heard about the new Marvel Spider-Man films after growing up with Tobey Maguire's version; it was both exciting and terrifying seeing a familiar story reimagined. Do you think they'll capture the same magic, or is it destined to disappoint?

Reply Like

Avatar of Pura
Pura

New Member

31 messages 2 likes

I still cant believe they are doing this again after the movies already exist and did so well. HBO must really think people forgot the old ones. I guess making it a series instead of movie gives more room for details from the books that got cut before, that part I am actually curious about. But recasting everyone means we lose that connection we had with the original actors, they grew up on screen and now it feels replaced. The cast list is huge though, they really went all out with casting even small roles like Cuthbert Binns. I hope the writing keeps the humor and doesn't try too hard to be dark and serious like a lot of reboots do these days. Christmas release makes sense for family viewing. Still on the fence if I will watch it or just rewatch the originals instead honestly.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of DapperVibes
DapperVibes

Refined Rebel

395 messages 22 likes

Not gonna lie, seeing Nick Frost as Hagrid got me interested more than I expected.

Reply Like

Avatar of ChaChaCha
ChaChaCha

Member

373 messages 13 likes

I was a kid when the first Harry Potter movie came out, so yes, this reboot makes me feel old. I am not angry about it, though. The books are big enough that another adaptation does not bother me. What interests me is seeing Hogwarts with modern production design and more time for the smaller characters. Neville, the Weasley family, Draco, and even some of the teachers can get more attention this time. I also want to see how they handle the early friendship between Harry, Ron, and Hermione. That part worked well in the movies, but there is still more from the books that could be used. I am going to watch the first episode before judging the cast. The teaser needs to show me the tone first. I am curious, but I am not expecting magic on day one.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Pasta City
Pasta City

New Member

371 messages 22 likes

I honestly did not think we needed another Harry Potter adaptation, but I will still watch it. The original movies are still easy for me to revisit, so this new version has to offer something different. The bigger cast gives me some hope. I want more time with characters who felt like background figures before. Professor McGonagall, Filch, Neville, the Weasleys, and the other students could all benefit from that. I am also curious about the visual design because Hogwarts has been seen so many times already. They need to make it feel familiar without simply copying the old movies. That is probably the hardest part. I am not going into this expecting perfection. If the actors have good chemistry and the writing stays close to the books, I think I will have a good time watching it.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Cupid is so Dumb
Cupid is so Dumb

Active Member

371 messages 30 likes

This is exactly why the industry feels stuck right now, nobody wants to make something new, they just keep repackaging old stories because it guarantees money. I get why from a business side, Harry Potter brand is worth billions, but creatively it feels lazy. John Lithgow as Dumbledore is an interesting choice though, he has the presence for it. I wonder how they will handle certain book scenes the movies skipped, that could be the only real selling point here

Reply Like

Avatar of Palace Kitty
Palace Kitty

Crazy!

370 messages 9 likes

The Snape casting is going to start arguments before the first episode even airs. That is guaranteed. I remember when the original movies were being cast, and people had strong opinions about almost everyone. Now we get to do it all over again. Personally, I am more interested in the child actors because Harry, Ron, and Hermione carry so much of the story. They need to feel like actual kids becoming friends, not three young actors trying to imitate Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson. I also like the idea of seeing more of the school year itself. The first movie had to move pretty quickly through everything. A series can slow down and show the friendships, classes, rivalries, and weird little Hogwarts moments. That is the part I hope they focus on most.

Reply Like

click to expand...