Read my smart post
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,630
Not sure how many Trekkies are on here, but I just started watching TNG (thanks Netflix!) and thought I would start a thread to talk about it
I'm 16 episodes in, and it's rough so far, everyone I've talked to said the first season sucks, so i'm sticking with it hoping things pick up. I've only seen 6 or 7 episodes of the TOS and the first 4 movies (Bones for life yo!), so i'm not an expert on the Star Trek Universe
One thing I wanted to ask about, I saw a documentary Gene Roddenberry's son did about his dad, and it was heavily implied that the reason the beginning of the show was so bad was because Gene Roddenberry was a strong influence on the show. He wouldn't allow the characters on the show to have conflict, he limited the subject matter, etc. So when he died the writers got more freedom and the show got better
So basically, did TNG suck in the beginning because Gene Roddenberry was too involved?
I'm 16 episodes in, and it's rough so far, everyone I've talked to said the first season sucks, so i'm sticking with it hoping things pick up. I've only seen 6 or 7 episodes of the TOS and the first 4 movies (Bones for life yo!), so i'm not an expert on the Star Trek Universe
One thing I wanted to ask about, I saw a documentary Gene Roddenberry's son did about his dad, and it was heavily implied that the reason the beginning of the show was so bad was because Gene Roddenberry was a strong influence on the show. He wouldn't allow the characters on the show to have conflict, he limited the subject matter, etc. So when he died the writers got more freedom and the show got better
So basically, did TNG suck in the beginning because Gene Roddenberry was too involved?