SUMMER isn't any different? SUMMER? You're shitting me, right?
...She isn't. I don't see any difference. She began the story as a person and she's still the same person. Yes, she was a prissy ***** in her FLASHBACKS...but she had already become a better person when the story actually began. Why the **** is it necessary if it results in the worst story of the series so far?
I'm gonna have to agree with Gusto in his saying that your criticisms make no sense. You say that the team should have no reason to work under Truman, even though we already went over the fact they DON'T work for Truman.
Didn't he command them to go into the city in one episode? I wanna say Go For the Green.
You say that Summer didn't change after her episodes, which shows you clearly didn't even WATCH THE DAMN EPISODES.
She hasn't changed at all since the series began. She changed in a flashback invented wholecloth for the sake of her two parter that had no hinting earlier in the series and will have no repercussions for the rest of the series because the change HAPPENED BEFORE THE SERIES BEGAN.
You say Truman had no reason to let Scott leave the dome because he told the team to morph to fight Tenaya's hand when 1) Truman was not there to see it,
I'm saying that Truman's choice was justified because we see how incompetently Scott led his team against a hand. It doesn't matter if Truman didn't see it. Scott showed us he was a fucking moron and Ranger Red's entire premise is faulty because of it. If Scott had trouble with A HAND when Truman actually trusted him, why should I believe Scott would be qualified for anything when Truman DIDN'T?
2) we already went over that her hand WAS ABOUT TO KILL DILLON,
The fact that they just stood like retards while it simply wedgied Ziggy doesn't really give me much to care about with this point, either. A good soldier would have bothered attacking the enemy when it was doing stupid or defenseless.
and 3) that has no relevance to... anything really.
It does. It proves Scott's an idiot and Ranger Red's moral doesn't advance his character at all.
You completely miss the point of the "Ranger ____" series, which is not to advance the plot, but to set up the characters' backstories and explain what they were doing when Venjix hit.
That would be great...if it had some relevance to where they are now. It's not that I don't want back story. I like back story. I just want it to be relevant.
I don't need to know that Summer was once a prissy ***** with a dead butler because she's already a nice girl in the main plot. There's no notion of "I wasn't always this way" or "Wow, Summer's really different" prior to that. Summer is Summer. The only different personality she's given is a flashback INTERNAL to her focus episode...and by the end of that focus...surprise, still the same girl. It's an ILLUSION of development. These flashbacks were internal to her focus story...and considering the focus ended with the Summer we already knew, there are no lasting repercussions because it had to INVENT personality flaws whole cloth just to have a story. It wasn't like Scott...we SAW the fact his brother died and that gave at least SOME justification for Ranger Red.
Ziggy's focus, as much as I didn't like it, at least developed his relationship with Dr. K and how they sort of became friends or at least tolerable acquaintences. The back story was used as an active device to develop the present narrative.
Ranger Blue really didn't, either. "Oh, Scottish guy who never does anything. You like to help people and have a dad. Let's not actively develop the storyline with your back story."
Ranger Red, Ranger Green, and Dr. K DID progress the main narrative with their back stories. I don't like these episodes that much, but I do respect and appreciate those elements. That's how flash backs should be used. A character recalls previous events because they are relevant to the present. Ranger Blue's story involved a conflict that had to be invented and resolved in the half hour and really didn't develop anything. Ranger Yellow was similar. Those characters didn't actively change at ALL. It just seems like they did. But they didn't. They started the series as one person and when their focus ended, they were the EXACT SAME PERSON.
Ranger Red may've, I feel, been invalidated by it trying to make Truman look wrong despite Scott in the present storytelling being nothing short of an idiot (By standing while an enemy is giving his teammate a wedgie and doing NOTHING). Truman's presence isn't necessary for my own assessment.
Ranger Green, I feel, was invalidated by the fact it simply didn't show why Ziggy should be a Ranger. Okay, sure, he's a nice guy...but it didn't prove anything.
But I give the latter two credit for at least advancing SOME element of the main story or the character's arc.
AND you say that Dr. K. should have realized that they were lying when it was many years ago that she was last outside. It's not out of the realm of belief to think she didn't even remember being outside.
Complex math equations are easy to remember, but a bike ride isn't? Especially considering she knew these equations prior to being outside? She'd never make the correlation she was once outside? Really?
You're not being questioned because you don't like Eddie--you're being questioned because your criticisms don't make sense.
And yet you'll praise a show where a high security dome can have Grinders casually walking the street and even attacking the RPM base to take down a wedding because Corinth apparently has no defenses of any sense at all the right times.
And I don't make sense?