As a lot of you people know from my posts I'm starting my Tokusatsu-review comedy webshow that I can officially announce will be called "The Toku Advisor."
However, I've been checking out this pretty-well known reviewer called EZ Rider of "Toku Time" who reviews a lot of the stuff I plan on reviewing such as Super Sentai, Kamen Rider, Power Rangers, Ultraman, etc. and I've started to worry if I'm too late to try to start reviewing Toku and I'm worried that I might be compared to them and seem unoriginal since I'm talking about the same thing that EZ Rider is talking about.
So, my question is: What can I do that's different from EZ Rider and other reviewers? What kind of format and techniques I could use to not be compared to them?
Oh, and a side question: Do you guys even like EZ Rider's "Toku Time" reviews? And other reviewers that you like an dislike?
However, I've been checking out this pretty-well known reviewer called EZ Rider of "Toku Time" who reviews a lot of the stuff I plan on reviewing such as Super Sentai, Kamen Rider, Power Rangers, Ultraman, etc. and I've started to worry if I'm too late to try to start reviewing Toku and I'm worried that I might be compared to them and seem unoriginal since I'm talking about the same thing that EZ Rider is talking about.
So, my question is: What can I do that's different from EZ Rider and other reviewers? What kind of format and techniques I could use to not be compared to them?
Oh, and a side question: Do you guys even like EZ Rider's "Toku Time" reviews? And other reviewers that you like an dislike?