It would probably be a box office success, that goes without saying, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will be good.
I don't have a problem with "grimdark", but Hollywood and directors just usually use it to make up for the plot and piss poor acting. Watchmen & V For Vendetta were excellent "grimdark" films that didn't make me feel like a complete jackass for watching them.
I'm not sure MMPR would be exactly grimdark, but it depends on who does it really. I'm not sure I'd buy into a darker version unless it executed it with some balance.Disney has proven to be able to do a sci-fi film without it being dark ,but it has not proved it could sell one to the masses other than Marvel.
If they were to get PR back, would it be better if it went under Marvel or Lucasfilms so they could handle the series?
I loved Watchmen, but I can never see that work for Power Rangers, which is why I suggested it be a satire of sorts of the dark superhero movies kinda like the TMNT was for the dark comics of the 80's.
-----
But on the side of Star Wars, I want to see a connection with previous Lucas films which were said to be connected to Star Wars, especially through that one unpublished story....
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Alien_Exodus Or a Doctor Who crossover.
I like that we'll finally be out of prequel era ****, that they've done a fantastic job with Marvel properties, great cartoons lately, and that we're finally no longer stuck eternally in the prequel era.
I actually liked John Carter quite a bit, and know for damn well it failed cuz nobody knows they should care about what John Carter was and its marketing was ****.
This is absolutely nothing but a good thing to have it out of Lucas's hands and it also means the very likely return of "Han shoots first" original movie releases.
Wait a minute, they changed the way that Han shot?